• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Бакалавриат 2026/2027

Культурная политика

Когда читается: 3-й курс, 4 модуль
Охват аудитории: для своего кампуса
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 3
Контактные часы: 40

Course Syllabus

Abstract

This course introduces how cultural policy works and why it matters. We keep a political-theory lens, but speak the language of cultural studies and real cases. Students examine who makes decisions, how funding and institutions operate, and how values (like heritage, identity, access, and diversity) shape outcomes. We compare practices across regions and look at external dimensions such.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • recognise when cultural issues become questions of public policy
  • compare how different institutions and countries organize cultural policy
  • analyse cases involving funding, heritage, censorship, cultural diplomacy or digital platforms
  • explain how cultural policy is connected to power, identity and representation
  • assess the effects of a cultural policy or programme, including its limits and unintended consequences
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • distinguish cultural policy from cultural politics and cultural diplomacy
  • identify who is involved in making cultural policy and what kinds of decisions are actually at stake
  • explain how cultural institutions participate in producing ideas of the nation and its past
  • look at a particular canon, museum or heritage institution and identify what it includes, what it leaves aside and how these choices are made
  • use P.Bourdieu’s ideas of cultural capital and distinction without turning every cultural difference into a class diagram
  • explain how access, recognition and taste are connected to social position and institutions
  • compare different ways in which public support for culture is organised
  • explain why cultural goods are economically unusual and why this matters for policy
  • analyse how copyright, ownership, platforms and markets affect cultural production
  • trace what happens around a concrete urban cultural project: who gains, who pays, what changes in the area
  • connect cultural investment with regeneration, tourism, branding and gentrification
  • analyse a cultural diplomacy project in terms of the institutions involved, what they want and what kind of relationship they are trying to build
  • explain how something becomes recognized as “heritage” rather than treating heritage as a self-evident category
  • follow what happens after such recognition (who gets authority, visibility, resources or new obligations)
  • distinguish legal claims from historical, political and symbolic ones, and see where they overlap
  • explain how platforms have become part of cultural governance
  • analyse how algorithms, platform rules and business models affect what is produced, circulated and seen
  • compare different criteria used to estimate whether a cultural policy or programme has worked
  • see what gets lost when success is reduced to one measure, whether attendance, economic impact, inclusion or visibility
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • 1. What cultural policy is?
  • State, nation and canon
  • Culture, power and inequality?
  • Institutions of cultural policy
  • Culture as economy and industry
  • City and culture
  • Cultural diplomacy
  • Case: UNESCO, heritage and global cultural regimes
  • Memory, trauma and decolonization
  • Digital cultural policy
  • How cultural policy can be evaluated?
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Seminars activity
  • non-blocking Colloquium
    The colloquium will be based on one cultural policy case. Students will receive the case in advance and will have time to prepare. The case can deal with a museum, a heritage dispute, a funding decision, an urban cultural project, censorship, restitution, cultural diplomacy, or another issue discussed in the course. During the colloquium, students will be asked to identify the main problem, explain who the main actors are and what their positions are, and use the course readings and concepts to analyse the case. We may also discuss what other policy options were available and what their consequences could have been. There is no single correct answer. What matters is whether the student can understand the case, use the course material and defend their argument.
  • blocking Oral exam
    The final exam is oral and is based on exam tickets. Each ticket includes two questions: one theoretical question and one case. Students have 10 minutes to prepare, followed by a discussion with the instructor. The first question is based on the concepts, arguments and readings discussed during the course. Students may be asked to explain an idea, compare two approaches or discuss a particular problem. There is no need to reproduce everything from the reading list. One or two readings used properly are better than a list of names. The second question is a cultural policy case. Here students are expected to work out what the problem is, who is involved and which parts of the course are useful for making sense of it. Simply naming concepts is not enough. The instructor may ask additional questions during the discussion, including questions that connect the ticket to other parts of the course. There may be more than one good way to approach the case, but students should be able to explain and defend the choices they make in their answer.
  • non-blocking Midterm
    The midterm is an individual written assignment completed in class. Each student gets one concept from cultural policy. First, they need to explain what the concept means. Then they build a small concept map around it, showing how it connects to other ideas from the course. These connections can be to other concepts, theories, authors, institutions or cases we have discussed. Not every possible connection needs to be included. The important thing is to show why the connections make sense. A definition on its own is not enough. The task is to show that the student understands how the concept fits into the course and how it can be used.
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2026/2027 4th module
    0.25 * Seminars activity + 0.35 * Oral exam + 0.25 * Colloquium + 0.15 * Midterm
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • 9781351164238 - Cynthia Scott - Cultural Diplomacy and the Heritage of Empire : Negotiating Post-Colonial Returns - 2020 - Routledge - http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2299963 - nlebk - 2299963
  • Beck, A. (2003). Cultural Work : Understanding the Cultural Industries. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=137678
  • Bellavoine, C., Bouquillion, P., & Wiart, L. (2018). Digital Platforms and Performing Arts: Communication of Theatrical Institutions, Audience Development, and Platform Strategies of Industrial Players.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction : A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Taylor & Francis [CAM].
  • Cultural policy : management, value and modernity in the creative industries, O'Brien, D., 2014
  • Frug, G. E., & Barron, D. J. (2008). City Bound : How States Stifle Urban Innovation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=671427
  • Jan C. Jansen, & Jürgen Osterhammel. (2017). Decolonization : A Short History. Princeton University Press.
  • Jerome de Groot. (2016). Consuming History : Historians and Heritage in Contemporary Popular Culture: Vol. Second edition. Routledge.
  • Kim, H. V. (DE-588)1144992745, (DE-576)495581577, aut. (2017). Bridging the theoretical gap between public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy / Hwajung Kim. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.493269568
  • Offenhuber D., Ratti C. Decoding the city: Urbanism in the age of big data. Birkhäuser, 2014.
  • Olga Goriunova. (2012). Art Platforms and Cultural Production on the Internet. Routledge.
  • Robinson, H. (2019). Interpreting Objects in the Hybrid Museum : Convergence, Collections and Cultural Policy. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2084548
  • Rose, M. V. aut. (2017). A new cultural diplomacy : the integration of cultural relations and diplomacy / Martin Rose. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.491786824
  • The social impact of the arts : an intellectual history, Belfiore, E., 2010

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Imagined communities : reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Anderson, B., 1991
  • Время, вперед! Культурная политика в СССР / под редакцией И. В. Глущенко, В. А. Куренного. — Москва : Высшая школа экономики, 2013. — 272 с. — ISBN 978-5-7598-1082-7. — Текст : электронный // Лань : электронно-библиотечная система. — URL: https://e.lanbook.com/book/65996 (дата обращения: 00.00.0000). — Режим доступа: для авториз. пользователей.
  • Пространственное воплощение культуры : этнография пространства и места, Лоу, С., 2024

Authors

  • Kuznetsova Elena Viktorovna
  • Zakharova Elizaveta Sergeevna
  • Vishniakova Nataliia Vladimirovna